Monday, July 26, 2010
Aftershock
Share
For a country that had to make do of the lies an illegitimate president presented as the state of the nation, President Benigno Aquino’s speech before Congress today was a breath of fresh air.
From a State of the Nation Address devoted to former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s self-righteousness, enumerating even the least significant accomplishments of her administration, Filipinos listened to a speech that exposed the anomalies of the Arroyo government and proposed an escape from the hell-bound path Arroyo’s nine years in power set for the Philippines.
Aquino opened the speech earlier projected to be “shocking” with what corruption he uncovered during his first few weeks in Malacañang, a string of exposés that would have prompted Arroyo, who now holds a Congressional seat as Pampanga 2nd district representative, to walk out of Congress had she not flown to Hong Kong to avoid that awkward moment.
But it was not the irregularities Aquino revealed that shocked the Filipinos. It was the fact that such wrongdoing could be revealed.
We were aware of how the Arroyos stole from government coffers although we doubted that they would be discovered. Nine years of struggling to remain in power taught Arroyo that subtlety is the key to a successful theft, explaining why her secrets were kept except for rare circumstances when those involved in the crime were not satisfied with their share of the pot money—as in the case of the NBN-ZTE scandal where the De Venecias turned against Arroyo.
When Aquino gave case studies that illustrated the extent of corruption the Arroyo administration nurtured, he provided evidence to the crime Filipinos instinctively accuse Arroyo of and fuelled Filipinos’ wrath. It was as if there was a bad song in our heads and he pressed play.
After the shock, however, Aquino’s audience for his first SONA had little to work with for recovery.
He pointed an accusing finger at Arroyo, saying that the latter wrung this government dry of public funds yet failed to hint at the steps his administration are taking to hold her accountable, as if acknowledging his administration’s powerlessness over the former president.
He boasted of the Truth Commission he convened to look into the allegation against Arroyo yet omitted the fact that it is to be headed by former Chief Justice Hilario Davide, who played a key role in placing Arroyo in power and whose term in the Supreme Court was likewise hounded by controversy.
Instead of offering concrete solutions to problems, Aquino used motherhood statements. “We shall put an end to unwise spending of public funds; we shall rid this government of projects that fail,” he said. Encouraging as these words may be, they bounce off deaf walls without concrete initiatives that elicit cooperation.
Without action, these words are beautiful and meaningless; ideal and unreal.
And although Aquino’s speech offered a stark comparison to Arroyo’s in terms of highlighting the problems to guide the lawmakers in legislation, his first SONA may be likened to Arroyo’s in terms of evading some issues that involved him.
Farmers and progressive groups who held Aquino to his promise of subjecting Hacienda Luisita to agrarian reform were waiting for him to touch on the matter in his speech before Congress yet were surprised that he was mum on the issue of land reform, raising doubts that he would deliver on other promises he made in the campaign period.
His praise for the private sectors’ involvement in the delivery of public services also raised flak from militant groups who oppose the slightest indication of commercialization.
Particularly disappointing was how Aquino tackled his plans on education as if it were just another service that could be improved with increased public-private partnerships. As students of the country’s premier state university, we expected an agenda for action from Aquino, who succeeded a president whose term saw the greatest budget decline of budget for state colleges and universities.
In a country where education is mediocre more often than not, college education is a must and must therefore be a right instead of merely a privilege.
Thus although Aquino’s first SONA, similar to his first 100 days, makes Filipinos hopeful if not euphoric, we are inclined to be cynical.
Exposed to almost a decade of darkness, Filipinos rejoice at the promise of light at the end of the tunnel, assuming that it would lead to the end of our suffering. Until we are sure that it leads to an escape from this country’s miserable state and that it does not merely come from a lamp whose oil is bound to run dry, we shall doubt the light.
And until the Aquino administration puts an end to the problems the president revealed today, shocking the Filipinos with problems that cannot be solved is pointless.
For a country that had to make do of the lies an illegitimate president presented as the state of the nation, President Benigno Aquino’s speech before Congress today was a breath of fresh air.
From a State of the Nation Address devoted to former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s self-righteousness, enumerating even the least significant accomplishments of her administration, Filipinos listened to a speech that exposed the anomalies of the Arroyo government and proposed an escape from the hell-bound path Arroyo’s nine years in power set for the Philippines.
Aquino opened the speech earlier projected to be “shocking” with what corruption he uncovered during his first few weeks in Malacañang, a string of exposés that would have prompted Arroyo, who now holds a Congressional seat as Pampanga 2nd district representative, to walk out of Congress had she not flown to Hong Kong to avoid that awkward moment.
But it was not the irregularities Aquino revealed that shocked the Filipinos. It was the fact that such wrongdoing could be revealed.
We were aware of how the Arroyos stole from government coffers although we doubted that they would be discovered. Nine years of struggling to remain in power taught Arroyo that subtlety is the key to a successful theft, explaining why her secrets were kept except for rare circumstances when those involved in the crime were not satisfied with their share of the pot money—as in the case of the NBN-ZTE scandal where the De Venecias turned against Arroyo.
When Aquino gave case studies that illustrated the extent of corruption the Arroyo administration nurtured, he provided evidence to the crime Filipinos instinctively accuse Arroyo of and fuelled Filipinos’ wrath. It was as if there was a bad song in our heads and he pressed play.
After the shock, however, Aquino’s audience for his first SONA had little to work with for recovery.
He pointed an accusing finger at Arroyo, saying that the latter wrung this government dry of public funds yet failed to hint at the steps his administration are taking to hold her accountable, as if acknowledging his administration’s powerlessness over the former president.
He boasted of the Truth Commission he convened to look into the allegation against Arroyo yet omitted the fact that it is to be headed by former Chief Justice Hilario Davide, who played a key role in placing Arroyo in power and whose term in the Supreme Court was likewise hounded by controversy.
Instead of offering concrete solutions to problems, Aquino used motherhood statements. “We shall put an end to unwise spending of public funds; we shall rid this government of projects that fail,” he said. Encouraging as these words may be, they bounce off deaf walls without concrete initiatives that elicit cooperation.
Without action, these words are beautiful and meaningless; ideal and unreal.
And although Aquino’s speech offered a stark comparison to Arroyo’s in terms of highlighting the problems to guide the lawmakers in legislation, his first SONA may be likened to Arroyo’s in terms of evading some issues that involved him.
Farmers and progressive groups who held Aquino to his promise of subjecting Hacienda Luisita to agrarian reform were waiting for him to touch on the matter in his speech before Congress yet were surprised that he was mum on the issue of land reform, raising doubts that he would deliver on other promises he made in the campaign period.
His praise for the private sectors’ involvement in the delivery of public services also raised flak from militant groups who oppose the slightest indication of commercialization.
Particularly disappointing was how Aquino tackled his plans on education as if it were just another service that could be improved with increased public-private partnerships. As students of the country’s premier state university, we expected an agenda for action from Aquino, who succeeded a president whose term saw the greatest budget decline of budget for state colleges and universities.
In a country where education is mediocre more often than not, college education is a must and must therefore be a right instead of merely a privilege.
Thus although Aquino’s first SONA, similar to his first 100 days, makes Filipinos hopeful if not euphoric, we are inclined to be cynical.
Exposed to almost a decade of darkness, Filipinos rejoice at the promise of light at the end of the tunnel, assuming that it would lead to the end of our suffering. Until we are sure that it leads to an escape from this country’s miserable state and that it does not merely come from a lamp whose oil is bound to run dry, we shall doubt the light.
And until the Aquino administration puts an end to the problems the president revealed today, shocking the Filipinos with problems that cannot be solved is pointless.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete"And until the Aquino administration puts an end to the problems the president revealed today, shocking the Filipinos with problems that cannot be solved is pointless."
ReplyDeletePointless? Isn't that a bit too much?
While I do not mean to argue on your points on how the SONA lacked content on decisive and specific actions, I do take offense at how your critique of the President's SONA seems to suggest the P-Noy has done nothing with his SONA.
Is it really pointless to be true in a government of liars? Is it really pointless to be realistic in a government that irresponsibly fails to ascertain the true problems? Is it really pointless to make the doubts in our head, more concrete and thus a little less doubtful? Is it really, really pointless to share with the Filipino people the reality that besets our nation? Is not that sharing, that communication, that frankness, valuable in itself?
Remember he was speaking before Congress, the largest gathering of large-scale thieves in our country.
Were we expecting fireworks? Detailed plans? POCs? Deadlines? Powerpoint presentations?
After 9 years, during which even a single word uttered by the highest office of our land was greeted with cynicism and the gravest of doubts, I believe that what P-Noy has done, despite the lack of necessary action points, is to make the monster visible, to size up our enemy, to put forth knowledge of what we must fight against.
As far as Lao Tzu is concerned, knowledge of the enemy can make or break the success of a campaign.
Truthfully, how shallow are we to consider his truthfulness and transparency as merely "a breath of fresh air."
Seriously?
After 9 years of having our democracy threatened by the very head of our civil government, and clouded by the dark mists of corruption and irresponsible politics, why do you just put lightly having a president tell the truth?
Do we not see one immense value that P-Noy's SONA has? That after almost a decade of continued distrust in government, of declining public enthusiasm in the democratic project, and of the growth of the virtually all-too-powerful demons of graft and corruption, we actually hear a president tell the truth, and more importantly, not doubt his truthfulness.
But clearly, you set aside that milestone moment, and put it for granted.
There are many ways on how a SONA can be phrased, but, remarkably, P-Noy's was the first in a very long time, that actually talked about the Philippines, and not some foreign enchanted kingdom.
It was not the most soul-stirring speech that I have heard, nor was it the most inspiring. But somehow, it was empowering to note that we actually can know the sins of our leaders. That specifics of who did what and what sins were done and their gravity were being discussed, and that it is no longer taboo for a president to touch on those subjects, isn't that empowering?
Now, did P-Noy made the best with his speech? I agree, he did not. What it pointless? Unless you already knew the intricacies of the graft and corruption that GMA and her allies did, then I don't think it was in the slightest.
"Naghahanap ng mga konkretong solusyon sa mga nakagigimbal na panggulat si Kim Patria."
ReplyDeleteLinked here: http://pinoyjourn.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/pagharap-ni-pnoy-sa-pinoy/
Indeed, Aaron, after nine years of lies for the state of the nation, Aquino's speech when Congress convened last week deserves credit. Just not as much credit as you attribute to it.
ReplyDeleteI mentioned that what shocked and perhaps gave hope to the Filipinos was the fact that such corruption in government could actually be revealed. To say, however, that it is an indication of how Aquino's will be a presidency of plain honesty is blind fanaticism.
Realize that it was easy for Aquino to reveal the wrongdoing of the Arroyo administration because it was Arroyo's, not his. He was not being honest; he was being critical and rightly so.
Honesty or the lack of it was perhaps manifested in how he failed to touch on Hacienda Luisita, an omission, which, following you logic, foretells how this administration shall dodge issues that put the president in a bad light.
You are offended by the adjective "pointless," which, as I take it, you misunderstand as a modifier for Aquino's SONA.
But what we consider pointless is the act of revealing the government's grave problems without attempting solution. It may be likened to a diagnosing an illness without suggesting cure or gathering evidence without pushing for prosecution. Pointless is how we would describe such neglect. There is no better word for it.
Moreover, you seem to have overlooked the fact that we are giving him the benefit of the doubt when we used the word "until." We are simply saying that corresponding action must complement Aquino's expose.
UNTIL solutions to the problems the president revealed in SONA are implemented or, at the very least, offered, there is truth in Cong. Walden Bello's rabidly red comment: Telling the world of our woes was tantamount to national suicide for scaring off international aid and foreign investors and for killing what little hope remains in every Filipino.
You quoted Lao Tzu as saying that "knowledge of the enemy can make or break the success of a campaign." But even Lao Tzu would agree that knowledge of an enemy alone is not enough to secure victory. One has to wage war.
Thank you for the link, Anjo!
ReplyDeletechanel outlet
ReplyDeletechanel outlet online
chanel bags
chanel bags outlet
Chanel Handbags
Chanel Boots
Chanel Bracelets
Chanel Wallets
Chanel Earrings
Chanel Brooch
Chanel Rings
Chanel Necklaces
Chanel Belts
Chanel Barrette
Chanel Pendant
Chanel Shoes
Chanel Sunglasses
Chanel Hats
Chanel Jewelry
Chanel Tote Bags
New Chanel Handbags
Chanel Flap Bags
Chanel Cambon Bags
Chanel Backpack Bags
Chanel Travel Bags
Chanel Luggage
Chanel Hobo Bags
nice blog.. keep sharing blogs..
ReplyDeleteGun Magazines
Austin Divorce Lawyer
American Flags
House Cleaning RI
Alaska King Salmon Fishing
hola me gusto mucho tu blog, excelente contenido no te olvides visitar el mio http://intantworld.blogspot.com/
ReplyDeleteme gustaría que visites mi blog de antemano muchas gracias.
hello. read your bio/info and am sorry to say, but it should be "follow us 'on' twitter and 'on' facebook" instead of 'in'
ReplyDeleteplease, do correct the mistake.
thank you.
I countenance, I make not been on this webpage in a endless time? withal it was added feeling to see It is such an vital content and ignored by so numerous, alter professionals. I thank you to service making grouping more alive of practical issueExcellent whatsis as exemplary.
ReplyDeletesbo
livescore
Their family moved to Street to be dealt into the Situation and sacrificed their son to achieve this.
ReplyDeleteAnd they will both suffer a similar fate when poetic justice takes its toll.
Due to this legacy of being a preditor, they placed ugly evil in as their descendants.
Birds of a feather flock together. Not only do the gods reincarnate based on their legacy so do they group business clients, associates and friends. All those in their lives are fucking preditors just like them.
If the gods approve an encounter this is exactly what you're going to hear, unless the coward gods cower to my ability yet again and affect my delivery.
The other nice < align="left">Belstaff thing about using the Hogan "pane of glass" image is it will help with your alignment. As you settle into your stance, imagineAsics Tiger Shoes Hogan's pane of glass being perpendicular to your target line. This will help you align your feet, your hips, and your shoulders to the target line - all crucial Asics Tiger components for proper alignment.
ReplyDelete